D48 & newer PIC 12fxxx parts
Posted: 10 Nov 2011 17:16
I have a d48, and have been quite pleased with it. Never found a part I couldn't program with it, until my latest project. The newer Flash based PIC's aren't supported,(namely 12f675) yet they are on the d48-xp and s4.
My d48 works great with windows XP-pro, on multiple machines., and I cannot justify the cost of upgrading the board inside my d48, if the only thing I can't program is Flash PIC's.. the cost of the upgrade is $300+ US, and a PIC programmer is less than $99 US.
Will an upgrade library be made available for the d48? the little S4 at nearly 1/2 the cost of the d48 programs the PIC12f series parts.
One gentleman inquired about In-Circuit programming for PIC's at the end of Feb.(jason, I believe?) However, if your PIC isn't supported in the first place, then how can you implement that method?
Seems to me, an elegant solution to the compatibility problems would be for Dataman to develop a ISP socket/cable solution that would plug into the d48., and a library update for the parts..
Either that, or make the XP upgrade board more affordable, and compelling for users to upgrade.
Mind you we've already made a $1295 investment, to insure we could program everything.
Does anyone else have this same situation?
My d48 works great with windows XP-pro, on multiple machines., and I cannot justify the cost of upgrading the board inside my d48, if the only thing I can't program is Flash PIC's.. the cost of the upgrade is $300+ US, and a PIC programmer is less than $99 US.
Will an upgrade library be made available for the d48? the little S4 at nearly 1/2 the cost of the d48 programs the PIC12f series parts.
One gentleman inquired about In-Circuit programming for PIC's at the end of Feb.(jason, I believe?) However, if your PIC isn't supported in the first place, then how can you implement that method?
Seems to me, an elegant solution to the compatibility problems would be for Dataman to develop a ISP socket/cable solution that would plug into the d48., and a library update for the parts..
Either that, or make the XP upgrade board more affordable, and compelling for users to upgrade.
Mind you we've already made a $1295 investment, to insure we could program everything.
Does anyone else have this same situation?